Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

Dominick  
Welcome everyone. We just pressed record. That was George Huber coming in. Welcome George. Happy Sunday. Today is November 17, 2024, the Lightlines will take a holiday sabbatical. We've talked with other transmitters, namely Elise and myself, and this will be the last week of Lightlines until the, I'm thinking, I'm thinking out loud here, probably the third week of January. So check into the forum for impromptu recorded transmissions that might come or may come.

And this allows, why is it happening? Well, since there's not that much in the transmission circuits right now, and given the situation, myself and Elise, we're not speaking for others, but we need time to recharge. We need to collect ourselves. I'm not speaking for Elise, but for me, I have too much on my plate, and that includes all this election stuff, things that are going on in the world, and then right in my front door, with this transition with Ron, helping out there, where I'm just a little burned out, and I'm taking a little, I seem to be in three worlds, three or four worlds at the same time, so I'm trying to strike a balance, and it's not conducive for receiving.

That being said, we do gather here today and we thank our Father, we thank our Lord Jesus Christ and Michael of Nebadon, they are one and the same, and we thank some of the gifts we have in revelation, and we hope that these Lightlines and programs still serve a good function for the spiritual thirst of not only our small dedicated group but that larger association and cooperation with others bears spiritual fruits in the will of our Father. So let's just spend a, take a deep breath, and center ourselves in that. 

And with that, the stuff I've received in the last, say, 24 hours leading up to this meeting today is that there will be, just like what's happening in the world with the elections, there will be a transition going on during this time period that we just talked about. So what's that going to entail? Well, it entails a change, certainly, obviously, the most immediate one is that Ron Bessor's not transmitting right now. He's recovering medically from the stroke, and so he is in his own personal circuit, so to speak, and not in the public service of the Father or Michael or any Melchizedeks for the Lightlines. There could be a review of the 5th epochal revelation, and this will do with what I'm calling the eventual whether Ron is alive in the near future or not.

When we do cooperate with groups out there, there will be a reckoning in terms of whether other groups intend to cooperate or not with the reckoning of the events of 2019 transmitted or received by Ron Bessor that involved the Supreme suicide and the Mother Spirit being affected by that to the point where She was implicated on what I can't even remember at this moment in time. But two things are coming out of where I'm going with this; one is more simple and straightforward. The answer to these questions, which I'm calling a Vatican two type of reckoning, in terms of if we cooperate with other groups, it's clear they're not going to consider those events by the supreme and they're relegated to fiction, whereas some of us have taken on an attitude of trying to discern whether that was real or not, and the jury is, frankly, still out. I don't think it'll be resolved.

And I think part of doing moving on, and these are kind of the two worlds I'm left to be in. Is that moving on, it would be unwise to try to convince what I'm not even convinced of myself. So this, this is a wait and see, and it's a to be determined. And I think there should be a commission put together. Jose, for example, you like to look into the archives or weydevu, you like to look into the archives, and I would appreciate people looking into the archives and determining the source of that, of those types of transmissions.

So that's a segue into the source of the transmissions. When you look at the fifth epochal revelation called The Urantia Book, it's very important to look at the author attributions and then understand who those personalities are, and those entities are. When I transmit and refer to something called, for example, original universe government. Original universe government starts with the original recorded personalities of time and space, and those are the Ancients of Days. When the Ancients of Days speak and act or are represented in the realms of time and space. Those are done through Divine Counselors, Perfectors of Wisdom, and Universal Censors. When they collectively rule, they rule for the Ancients of Days but they are the, for all intents and purposes, the personification of the Ancients of Days, and they're mostly the providers of the entire revelation of paper one.

Even further, for example, you have the Universal Censors. When they speak, there is no appeal to what they determine and what they say. For that matter, be very cognizant, be very aware of what they authored in The Urantia Book, and for that, they are part of the paradise Trinity in paper 10, The Seven Superuniverses in paper 15, and also paper 16, the Seven Master Spirits. I'm looking at the table of contents. And then finally, the Universe Power Directors in paper, 29.

It sounds like we've, I think we have a new sound for people coming and going. So if that sound happens again, I guess that's our that's our new entry and exit chime. So you don't need to pay attention to that, but we'll probably hear it again. Let's see.

For paper, so part two, so where am I going with this? What I received was that, you would do yourself a favor, and we would all do ourselves a favor if we were to, begin to shift our identities away from The Urantia Book and more into the attributions of the authors who wrote the book. This is in no way denigrating The Urantia Book or changing it, but if you meet any group, we're dedicated to the teachings and the spirit of the book, they can't get out of the identity of the book. The identity of any association or group is, I'm a Urantia Book reader, we're a Urantia Book group, and so on. It makes it difficult, just like any other religion who identifies with their primal source or teacher, if you're Islam, it's the Quran, and then the various sects of Christianity, in the Bible, and so on.

So what I received was that a simple exercise is when you catch yourself being conditioned to say The Urantia Book says x, y z, you should strive to delve one step deeper and try to be more specific that when you say The Urantia Book says x y z, do the little bit of extra work to know whereof you speak, ie, which section of the book, and therefore, which author. When you speak of God and say part one; those are very important aspects of the Revelation, and they're probably the most authoritative, and that's probably something that really helps to tie things together. And the future of the revelation will be taken by younger people who are capable of assimilating this complex information for us older folks, and us older folks can do a job producing materials based off of this revelation that are more, make it easily ingestible for people to look at. This is so simple.

It's things like there are so many methods of relaying complex taxonomies of things like these universe beings, you have no idea how kids have been raised now with complex games and entire universes that are even more complex than this book of a revelation, of its parts. So part of the identity is going to shift in the future, and this is part of the seismic shift that's going on in the world. So identity will begin to shift for for you as soon as you begin the simple exercise of author and entity and personality attribution to the paper rather than the, I don't know if it's fair to call It lazy, but it's an autumn, it's a human tendency to sum it all up and then eventually that tendency turns into an identity and then the identity takes on a life of its own, and then you get eventually into the profane politics of mankind.

And on that note, the profane politics of men who do deal with governance and we are in epochs of insurrection and rebellion, and this is no different in these times of governance and insurrection. I'm so sick of hearing people talk. I'm amazed you all even come here and attend this to hear me talk. I assume it's because a lot of you aren't so inundated with media. Because what I've heard is that people over 50 years old are the only ones listening to legacy media anymore. So maybe you don't share what I have because I take from so many different sources, I'm tired of hearing people react to sources upon sources, reacting to sources, and you can't even tell what's what. Thank you for listening, and thank you for being here and even listening to these things.

So coming out of that, I need to reiterate. We need to hear, we need a commission to audit the revelations and transmissions alleging the status of the Supreme. From there, we'll take an appeal, we'll make an appeal to our spiritual authorities to validate that or not, and we should do that before we seek to integrate with other groups who will not cooperate with us unless they feel comfortable resolving these things. It's hard enough dealing with groups that don't deal with transmission, and that's why it was important to get last weeks out, even though that wasn't a transmission, there needs to be an audit about what the pool of transmitters are able to accomplish now, similar to what we were talking about, even a couple weeks ago, a lot of transmissions over the lifetime of years take on a potential, and when you learn about the Supreme, really, the Supreme is another word for what time and space are providing us, and that is potentials turned into actuals.

When we are on a personal evolution of attainment then attains a new personal realization of God. Then does the universe change in augmenting even deity. This is in the Revelation. In other words, your experiential attainment of God with new and more advanced meanings in experiential attainment contributes not only to yourself but the universe and that is not an end in and of itself, but that you also take that experience and turn that into actuals, and the actuals are born in the fruits of loving your fellow man and woman and serving them, but also serving what you do in life with a healthier attitude that any contribution you make is a contribution to the actuality of time and space, rather than a fruitless effort of deterministic, materialistic fate of returning to dust. Let's see, I'll end with the only other actual authors that I could tell off looking at this by name, Malavatia Melchizedek, Manovandet man o van det spelled, man o van det so it sounds, phonetically sounds Melchizedek, and Machiventa. All the rest were part of the Melchizedek corps of Nebadon.

Weydevue, I don't know why I'm thinking of you, but you always ask these types of questions. If you go back and look at the Lucifer rebellion consequences on this planet, about when the circuits were cut off, there were superhumans left on this planet, cut out from the circuits. But it's an amazing loophole you have, even on the planetary receivership an advisory board that entails an Evening Star from Avalon, some of these things we forget. It helps to be reminded of how fascinating these narratives are in these papers. This is going back to the fundamentals. You can rest assured that paper or Part One of the revelation comes from the highest sources in the universes of original universe government dealing from the entities that represent and are of the personal representation of the Ancients of Days out in the realms of time and space, Universal Censors, Divine Counselors and Perfectors of Wisdom, and then that when they gather in a Council of Nine to bring a judgment, that judgment has never been appealed or altered, and it is for all intents and purposes, speaking of the Ancients of Days.

Our fate, our ascension plan for those with distinguished service, which is possible in this type of realm that we in, that suffers rebellion, we have a very good opportunity to not only have these realizations, but also to begin to act upon these and turn those realizations from potential into actual, and with such distinctions, even in the attempt you regardless of if you fail in your own personal assessment, the attempt is probably worth it, because the attempt begins the registry of your ascension path into the potential right then and there of becoming a Mighty Messenger, One Without Name and Number, or One in High Authority. And those are just a different tier of ascended pilgrims of time and space that would serve in this greater superuniverse on your way to the Father on Paradise, and you might have distinguished service afterwards, and serve on those commissions with Divine Counselors, Universal Censors, and Perfectors of Wisdom. And this is also the case in part one, where on some occasions, we have a Mighty Messenger authoring the paper, and One Without Name and Number, together with a Divine Counselor on paper 31 which kind of discusses what I'm talking about in our eventual universe service in a corps of finality.

So I think that's all I have to provide. There are so many things going on in the world, looking at, I'm just going to go down a bullet list of potpourri things. Now you can raise your hand by pressing five star and asking a question about some significant things that were just relayed. So feel free to do that, and while I'm looking at the dashboard, I'll just share some thoughts and review on some current events. Trust me, it's not going to go into the elections right now.

But if you look at some past Lightlines, ones that I gave, I think there was one called one about psychopathy. And if you're following things like that, and where does that manifest in the world? And you look at societies and cultures and civilizations, there is a an emergency of psychopathy going on in, say, countries like China, which try to suppress what's going on, but that's a good social studies case where there is no religion whatsoever for the population, and they've been indoctrinated, much like our fiction novel that says something like 1984 where the state is God, and God exerts absolute authority over your life, day to day, moment to moment, and the only social net that you have outside of the state to help you is your own family. So if you have no family or bad family relations and you're ostracized from that network, you have nothing to fall back on. You are a total slave to the state.

And what that lesson on psychopathy stated was that in such social conditions, the human will turn psychopathic, and in one last creative act of irony, aimed to destroy as much be destructive and one last violent creative act before it defies the state, and you have what's called murder season in places like China now, where people are saying, we're basically rebelling against this authoritarian State and then doing things like running people over in mass, and then what they're doing is filming it because of all the social media attributes or capabilities. It immediately gets censored, but enough of it gets out that if you look for it, you can find what's going in places like that. So these things are not just associated with the West, but propaganda makes it sound like the West is the only place on Earth that experiences these things and is bad. It's totally not the case. It's probably worse in a lot of other countries, China being one of them, because they have no God, they have no economy, and they only have a state which has let them down. And people are murdering people before they murder themselves in mass. And one of the most destructive things you can do in an act of rebellion is also murder children, and so that's also an aspect that they're doing.

So let's, we're heading into this Thanksgiving season, let's appreciate the fact that we have religion still and the freedom to do that in these countries that we live in and join ourselves from on this call. So thank you. There's no questions at this time, but I can open it up off the record. Thank you for listening, and hopefully we get a transcript of this so that people can contribute to what called the action we said at the beginning, which was a full audit of the Supreme and Mother Spirit status so that we can move forward. Nothing of this nature will impact the fact that this Foundation exists for the explicit purpose of helping the missions that are slated and ongoing on this planet to resolve its rebellion status and put it back into the fold of our Lord's governance. Amen.

end
2

Girona,Catalunya, Spain.
Friday 6th December 2024
Subject: The Spirit of Christmas
Lemuel

https://app.box.com/s/uox317zqbhhhertk22pz1ivc9fbeuhfk
3

Dominick  
Hi, welcome everybody. It's November 10, 2024, and today is a resumption of the what's been called Lightline schedule on kind of a program provided by people with the Magisterial Foundation. Now, over the past course of say, this month with Ron Besser's, situation in particular, I've had to explain to people like his, like his closest family members who don't understand what he's in, what he's established, or what he's involved in, and things like this. And that's a very good lesson to have. Obviously, you need to be able to explain things to people who don't or aren't familiar with anything in the simplest of terms, so that they understand. And the Magisterial Foundation in the simplest of terms, is about our Father's business.

And whether that's if it's got sloganized can turn into about the Father's business, that's probably a matter of preference, or who you might be talking to in the context, but it's, the Foundation, is primarily about the Father's business. And so the who of that, the Father. is the Universal Father, the First Source and Center for those who don't like familiar, familial pronouns, and the who is also the, you could say the man and the divinity of Jesus. And so we label, or we discuss the who of Jesus many times in as we address the divine Son of man and the or the divine Son of Man, someone raise their hand and correct me if I mix these up, but the human man was Jesus, is Jesus and the divine Son. the Divinity, is someone we refer to as who that Son of God was before he lived his life as Jesus here, and we call him by the title, Michael of Nebadon.

So someone like George Huber is on the call today, who, I think you're kind of new to this vernacular, but that's the who is, what we call Michael of Nebadon, by the you could say the alternate other name of Jesus because that's who Jesus was before he was a living life as Jesus on earth. He was Michael of Nebadon, and then he resumed his seat with the Father. Now the so that moving on, one thing we want to do is understand about the Magisterial Foundation and these programs is it's kind of an extension of something with roots back in the era, earliest, early century of the 20th century, when The Urantia Book was in its prepublication date, all the way back in decades before, and that was part of the the forum and the Sadler commission.

And the interesting thing was, I was at, I was at the Foundation, which happens to be Ron's house, you know, just yesterday, I think. And one of the books in the library is, is the Mind at Mischief, by Dr Sadler. And that's really a canon back in the day. It's underappreciated today, as Freud and Jung are the household names you could say of the era, whereas Sadler delved into the much more of the religious and paranormal spiritualism and came up with some very good insights for psychoanalysis that was going on in the founding of psychology back in the day.

So for anyone, for example, Lina, if you're trying transmitting, and anyone encouraged to try transmitting, really, one of today's themes is go back to the fundamentals. And to do that, you should probably be willing to examine all sorts of things, not necessarily starting with that book, but if you could do things like that, you can find that book online, like in a PDF, and it's called the Mind at Mischief by Dr William Sadler. And I think one of the main takeaways for that is that there's a lot of explanation for the phenomenon of transmitting that might come from the human mind and that some of it that comes through is not fully the human mind, and when it does, and I think this is Sadler's thesis, is that when it does, it always comes consistently from a higher power.

Now, the who of that higher power is very important, especially when you look back in the early days of the epoch I'm talking about the history, and even up to today, it's a little bit less so when people are very concerned about who and that is, is it coming from our Father, ultimately, and Jesus, or is it coming from the devil and demons and whatnot rebels. So the who is very important. And so when you're transmitting, and certainly publicly in a venue like this, and privately, you should always be very careful and deliberate and intentional on the who you are serving and connecting with and receiving from and worshiping and praying to. And so that's kind of a prerequisite.

And a secondary prerequisite would be not necessarily totally required, but it would be helpful to understand the fundamentals of something like the 5th epochal revelation, which will do nothing but help and augment any previous understanding you might have, and certainly does not aim to replace or fundamentally alter the truth about God and your relationship with him and the hers of the universe of spirit and deity and the myriad of spiritual administration that originates from the Paradise Trinity. And lastly, that would, if you look at it in modern times, that also extends to the subject of ETs, you could say too.

And on that note, I might go a little over, around the subjects but I've got a lot on my palette today. But to this extent, also, we are still going on a no circuits are open at this time, so there's no transmitting coming through. The circuits are closed to this type of past transmission until things get settled. But that doesn't mean things like the missions that we expected to happen like they were described throughout the years. That's no longer the case. But it doesn't mean the missions aren't underway. It just means that human involvement is not, is not really part of this equation right now.

So to continue, I'll just go. George Huber pointed me last week to Christopher Langan, and I saw some of his interviews, George and summarized: that's the kind of person ideally we would want on the board here at the foundation, just as a as an archetype of a type of person. And I think some of the things he talked about, and that's again, for those unfamiliar, apparently, he's got lots of interviews out there, Christopher Langan. But one thing I found interesting was that he came up through his own search and understanding the concept of what The Urantia Book calls the spirit economy. So when he was asked about, say, like capitalism, I think, or how the economies run on earth, he had come to the conclusion that there's some truth behind the way economies work on Earth, but that ultimately, and then, I can't paraphrase how even described it, but to me, it described what The Urantia Book describes as the spirit, or spiritual economy. So that's someplace you can you can find for an example of maybe different labels, but the same kind of concept.

Let's see back to well, let's start with something that might be more akin to what Geoffrey was speaking about not to directly related at the beginning of this light line, if you came in late, we had talked about some of the election stuff. Now, if you're, if you're going to be thinking about transmitting, not not only should you be thinking about the fundamentals, but you probably go through eventually things related to government programs, because eventually you you have to get down to the business or the understanding that there was war In Heaven, and does that mean that there is war in heaven? And what's the status of that conflict in heaven? And you're going to get, in general, when you are religious, you're going to have world beliefs that go into these things.

So you're you, you should look into things and come up to some understanding of some of these fundamentals, that if you're doing this in modern times, you're going to be having to look at things like is government totally transparent? Is it serving the people? Why are there different ideologies in the world? And that's just for starters. And then eventually you find out that there are factions beneath factions, beneath factions. But ultimately, who do they all serve, and to what end? So religious people understand this in pretty plain terms, the ultimate conflict is that it's the war in heaven. And to that respect, I thought Christopher Langan got everything more or less on par with where the status quo is at, except one thing, I thought he was in error, and that is the kind of duality of Lucifer and God. That Lucifer, he's included being an angel of light, was somehow necessary, like a duality there, and that the service of such malevolence served to help us experience and know what is good.

Now the, I don't know how this differs from, say, the biblical perspectives, but I think fundamentally The Urantia Book revelation, and that revelation would be coming not from a book, but the who is the authors, and when we talk about missions, those authors are primarily Archangels and Melchizedeks. Okay, so when you talk about the who, oftentimes you're talking about authors attributed to Archangels and Melchizedeks or subofficers, you could say subadministrators that are commissioned by either Archangels or Melchizedeks.

But those authors or those teachers or commissioners of Revelation, in that book, called The Urantia Book, would say that, fundamentally, Lucifer is not necessary. He's a rebel. He is not part of that kind of necessary duality. That duality is because of free will and the finiteness of time and space created an inherent choice that leads to evil, and evil is sometimes the aspect of error and the fact that we're not all-knowing of everything, and that sometimes evil is augmented by sin, like knowing what's good but doing what's self-serving and evil anyway, like the intentional knowing of doing evil would be sinful, but that Lucifer turned iniquitous and that is not necessary in the universe. In fact, it's suicidal to the beings and entities that are iniquitous. So that's how it differs from say, where those statements, by Langan's understanding, might come through.

So I think that covers the status quo of say, Lightlines and transmitting and missions. So the rest is rather, rather open, but I still have some material to cover in terms of what will have seem to be coming across the message board with the elections and what's previously come on the message board of this week. So let's start with AI in that thread, and back to the fundamentals. World War Two is really, I don't know if that's the right word, seminal, but it's a pivotal era in, say, the leading up to the what we call the adjudication of rebellion, which allegedly happened in around 1986 in some capacity of judgment on Lucifer and his chief lieutenants in personality annihilation, but that the rebellion itself has not been fully adjudicated on planets. And so our planet is no is not resolved of this yet, and therefore neither is the entire system of planets that went along with this.

So anyway, back to AI. So where does AI come from? And roughly it comes from the computing innovations of World War Two, of computers being invented to break codes. Alan Turing comes to mind, and also the calculations got a lot better processing. I think calculators, for example, were invented because the scientists needed to come up with a better calculating mechanism to determine how to shoot down aircraft from anti-aircraft guns. And that led to the basic understanding that you've got to lead the plane. You can't shoot at the plane. You've got to lead it.

But it seems so obvious today, but they literally had to come up with the calculator, kind of in order to do that. Similarly, computers happened at that time. The internet happened in the 1990s, probably was incubated in the 80s or earlier before that. I think it was. And all of this comes from allegedly DARPA, the secret arm of the military innovation to do this stuff. It's social media in the 2010s, global communications, like satellite phones, were starting to happen completely, or in the 2000s I skipped around some decades there, and then you had big data, which is the collection of all data points, and then I think probably to process that big data we've come up with with AI, and now it's being presented to us as something beneficial.

And certainly, it is, my take on it is that you can use it to establish a good framework from which to start from, rather than having to develop that framework and then go off of it. But to take it as truth value is an error and a mistake. So just my take on a server's thread there is that they're making a, to ascribe it to divinity, it's frustrating to even respond to because that assertion based on the fruits of its output is clearly Luciferian, and that it doesn't attribute to any of the who's it doesn't contribute to any of the fundamentals that God reveals about the origins of will, the origins of personality, and the origins of deity. Instead, the AI constantly comes up with self-reference to unsolvable problems that humans have.

One is this latest Google, there's a Google interview going on even this week in parallel if you want to know what I'm talking about. But you can't just talk about processing power in the search for knowledge and intelligence. That's clearly Luciferian if you know the fundamentals. So again, it's not a debate. You've got to know your fundamentals if you want to approach these things on the forum. If we're going to get any good things about it and stop worrying about stepping on people's toes. Occerpa is not going to get any better if you don't call it out. So we don't learn if there's not some semblance of emotion and conflict in the engagement. And that's one of the reasons people forget things in the first place, that if there's there's nothing that helps register it in the brain it goes in one ear and out the other.

That'll lead us to, I guess, another segue of brotherhood, and that if we aren't able to walk in someone else's shoes and understand their current point of view and experience, then we don't have the foundation of brotherhood. And one thing that went along, certainly in my observation in this election cycle, was that people are no longer able to or willing to even recognize what the opposing viewpoints are even coming from. Or can illustrate, elucidate, and communicate; this is like basic conflict resolution, even in like spousal marriage counseling, but if you can't say back to the other person or party what it is that they think that they're saying, and then you describe that back to them, you've got no basis for a democracy, let alone a civil conversation, etc, etc, and to talk about Nazis, misogyny, and basically everything coming out of MSNBC, which I've been watching with Ron religiously for three years or since I've been here, that's where I'm coming from.

It's because and hear me out. You don't have to agree with me, and I'll try to balance it out later on, is that those types of talking points and rhetoric clearly aren't, you know, the side that elected Trump is clearly not talking in those terms. And if you can't, if you can't recognize what happened and why that happened; so if you're asking yourself, how did this happen, and you don't understand why it happened, and your concept of why it happened is you come up with these very extreme talking points that have been bludgeoned into you through mass media then and you're willing to delve into conspiracy, then maybe what, so what Geoffrey is talking about, I suppose, is you're willing to go into a conspiracy that takes us back to globalists.

And I'm willing to go there with you so but maybe we don't agree, or we're not coming from the same place, but these are back to some of the fundamentals in modern times that this election for all of us who are in this type of environment, we're taking into account things that the government apparently have been interested in in doing to this democracy for generations now. And this would be going back to World War Two again, where Eisenhower warned us of things, Kennedy warned us of things, you know you had, then you had Nixon Johnson, Gerald Ford, and then you had maybe one of our first outsiders, Jimmy Carter, and we saw how an outsider in Washington, DC doesn't do so well.

But anyway, what we're getting at is things like and you should not be transmitting at face value without understanding some of these things too. Its Project Mockingbird, M K Ultra, Project Blue Beam or Blue Book and you could say CIA influence in Hollywood, and music, for that reason, going back to the fundamentals, is kind of one of the themes of today's Lightline. And really it's just absolutely fascinating to go back to Sadler's writings if you're a fan of, say, those eras like and of pre-World War Two and World War Two, whatever it is, The Urantia Book movement is totally allergic to talking about those types of things, because they're going with the zeitgeist of the times of being woke and not willing to talk about race.

Ironically, if you look at the Sadler writings, and you just plainly understand how they were talking about things like that, and what context that those things are very relevant to today. And one of the things was a book by Sadler talking about the Germans and the Prussians. And this also goes back to even Athens versus Sparta the Peloponnesian Wars, and that is, how do you educate spirit, and how does your culture get sustained through the institutions of family and education?

And William Sadler was from the brief blurbs I was reading, also deploying the German susceptibility to the Prussian education system. And if you want to know why that's significant, it's that the Prussian apparently the Prussian education system is how the US education system ultimately got modeled after.  You don't have to take my word for it. You can listen to one of the award-winning education people, John Taylor Gatto, G A, T, T, O, for something about that subject, and that's basically saying, are you going to have an authoritarian propagandist, government education system that favors compliance and indoctrination versus something that's more experiential and immersive education. So mostly when you see a divide those who are wealthy and able to provide their children with immersive, experiential education, who get exposed to people knowledgeable in various fields and teaching by doing, etc, etc, and the rest of the minions get indoctrinated.

So that's a segue into globalism because the globalist education system instills that. And interestingly enough, in the elections here in Pennsylvania, 29 year, Senator Bob Casey lost. Or is going to lose to first-time Senator McCormick. McCormick is a Republican. Casey is a Democrat, and in the last days, you could probably see where the wind was blowing electorally as a five-second blurb from the Casey advertisements said, don't vote for McCormick, he's an evil globalist. Now, why would someone like that say that if they didn't know that the electorate here in Pennsylvania was on to that type of mentality?

Similarly, if you're European, you're not you're not unfamiliar with with this either, as whoever is labeled a populist is basically an anti-globalist. So there's a lot more on that, but to be a globalist in this day and age is to in religious circles, fulfill or keep on the plan of, if you want to go all the way back, somewhere along the lines, there's a root cause or inspiration for the type of globalism we might be getting. And if it's not part of God, it's probably part of Lucifer, who claims this planet for the rebels. Now that's just on a meta-view. And then where we've come into conflict amongst ourselves is basically coming to the truth, but we're kind of all on the same side when it comes to our desire to see our planet in brotherhood, under under God the Father and not Lucifer.

So to that extent, you know, there has been, we have to acknowledge that there has been some far left, there has been some far right. And we want to get it back to where we're even able to help ourselves, and we can't do that when the now we know enough about social sciences and social studies and the pop culture of today really wants to get into who are psychopaths, who are sociopaths, and who are, who are people suffering from all sorts of things, and mainly with social media, narcissism is at an all-time high. So we've got, we're going to have to do better to educate and we're coming, we're able to be coming up with things like that.

I think a good recent interview from an historical perspective was done by the Hoover Institute this week with an interview called, the three historians. I think they did a good job criticizing thought that's coming out of the far left and being educated in our universities, and thought that's recently come out of the far right, and ironically, what links both of those extremisms was a sympathy with the ultimate Luciferian conflict of World War Two, which was backed by Nazi Germany, the occult of Lucifer. And when you see the far left embracing those types of ideas in this election, it kind of came from the Imam that Tim Walls referred to as one of his respected religious teachers, I think.

But what, ultimately, what's coming out of that was a sympathy for Nazi revisionism that put the Jews in a bad light, and the Jews as the devil of, say, the Elders of Zion type thing, which is a kind of a propaganda piece, you could say, at the very least, of a Luciferian faction. And those things tend to be traced back to things like materialism in its basest forms, and communism also came out of Germany, by the way. So those things were ultimately made their way through Germany and Russia back in the day. Now, where does it come from in the far-right. It came from that in this interview, they very vehemently criticized that interview that Tucker Carlson did of that amateur researcher, and they didn't call him a historian that called Churchill the main villain of World War Two, and Hitler not necessarily the main villain, because he looked at all these times he reached out for peace is kind of the thesis there now. And that is a revisionist and totally far-right thing, an error of what happened there.

So those are just an example of coming back to the center away from those things, because certainly those things could be considered sympathetic to Germany, Nazi Germany, and that in that case, the worry, the worrisome people of the electorate calling Trump MAGA fascism would cite that kind of well, research or contention, and they would be correct. But that's not the way the electorate ultimately really is, but it does get looked at, and so it should be corrected. So that's, that's academics. I did it. John Taylor Gatto.

Okay, let's do a Carole, songatsunrise. I'm changing the subjects briefly. There was a question about Reiki. Yes, Carole, knowing your situation, Reiki could be an additional thing that helps you. Reiki is a type of energy healing, and so these healers are not allopathic medicine, but they are more and more aware of how they can complement it. So my my advice to you and Reiki, for those not familiar with it, experienced practitioners of Reiki, time and time again, have personal experiences where they sense celestial helpers in their healing practices. So in this sense, Carole, I would simply be very upfront with your religious faith, and be comfortable working with a Reiki practitioner who understands and respects that and probably, furthermore has some experience that they probably can't put the same religious vernacular to, but certainly in spirit, could help you. And so it's worth a shot, and you shouldn't be afraid to look into it and and try it out. So that ends that.

Just as a timeline, I guess you could say is that, if you're looking at The Urantia Book, it started at the very least in the early 20th century, so the early 1900s probably late 1800s hundreds. Oh, okay, I wanted to button that back up. So there's a book that John Taylor Gatto, I think related to, I'm not sure, but there's a book called Tragedy and Hope. And so when we talk about globalists, the author of Tragedy and Hope is a guy named Caroll Quigley, and so he's basically looking at all the globalist institutions and being allowed to look at their meeting minutes from 1880 through 1963 and I think his main takeaway was; well, I agree with the good and noble aims that you're trying to do. What I disagree with is why you're being so secretive about it. So what does that say that there, I mean, there is a global elite. There is a more or less untransparent plan to go about doing it, and we're not crazy out of our heads to call them on it. Where we're differing is diagnosing where it's working, how it's operating, and how to fix it, because we're in a battlefield fog, so to speak, in this spiritual global conflict, how much of it is warfare, we don't know until it's at your door, I suppose.

But that's the point. Is that there are there are globalists, and they probably aren't all about God. To that effect, just in my analysis, and this could be open to discussion. If you look at this election, you know, maybe it was planned out that Trump was probably was going to die. If you're thinking the deep state was going to kill him, and how have they pivoted for him not to die, or whether we have a real shot at actually fixing the deep state, who knows? But certainly, those of us who voted for Trump and are pleased by that victory, you can work with us, because we're of the mind that this is an opportunity to correct some of the fundamentals back into the country, not to make it fascist, but to make it a constitutional democracy like our, like God is trying to shape it so that these missions can take effect and that America, well, the United States, could be under something like a divine regency of Magisterial Sons and I guess that's all I should say about that.

So that's everything on my, on my sheet. Let's go with something next, is that well, despite the forum might go into new forms in the future, I don't think in these modern times, having a wide open door is safe and secure anymore. There are just an overwhelmingly amount of automated malicious actors trying to steal the information. So basically, we're in a conundrum of having it open and publicly available, and the fruits of that policy now are simply having everyone's information exposed for us to be attacked by spam and fraudsters. So we're probably going to go to a more open firewall of usually that means a password and an account and a secure sign-in that at least keeps the bad actors out as much as possible.

Now we can start things like a book club. I think it'd be great to have some of these fundamentals revisited and looking at the Sadler's early works. Let's see, and that, I guess, in the final closing, one of the things that nod on me going to the UAE conference was a flippancy for the complexity of the revelation of The Urantia Book, comparing the basically sections one and two with the very complex taxonomy of universe beings and governance and personalities and administration of a vast universe of time and space, not just our planet, and that those things aren't really fundamental to the good news that Jesus brought of salvation and eternal life with God. And there's certainly a truth to that, but that ultimately, if you don't embrace, if you're not willing to look at some of these complexities and be willing to to educate each other on it, then that leaves us open to well, watering down some of the some of the more basic fundamentals as well.

So I think there should be some projects we could do, for example, not just leave it to, you know, there's basically studies we could produce and that ultimately, you know, and I'm just kind of guessing here, sociologically, that in general, you know, women aren't engineers. Women care more about relationships, for example, and men care more about things. Some on a wide level, probably, I'm guessing, men are more, concern themselves more with maybe the minutia of sections one and two of The Urantia Book, where women might not, and they would be more interested in the narrative of Jesus and some of the basic things that solidify relationship with spirit. And so I'm just getting at that in that it doesn't have to be men and women, but when we work on these projects, there ought to be a pairing like a battery of positive and negative, and so that would just be kind of a way to go about working together properly again.

Let's see if anyone's willing to go into AI. I would recommend that you would look at Llama. I think that's what Facebook has. And there's a, there's a limited time where you could put llama versions. That's Llama with L, L, A, M, A, you could put basically AI tools on your computers, and they will work without having to have any access to the internet. So those types of projects we could use Llama to do things like put in all these archive transmissions and begin to work with that data to develop patterns. All right, thanks for listening. It's 2:49.

end
4
General Discussion / Re: Foundation and Forum updates Oct 30 - Nov 1st
« Last post by Raz on December 05, 2024, 18:53:48 pm »

Dominick  
Hello, this is Dominick. I'm together here with Steven Gitz today, and not necessarily a Lightline, but it's November 1, 2024 and we have some updates, at least I do, Dominick, from the last several days, of which Steven has been privy to some but I asked him to attend with me so that he can so we can be together as two gather in Jesus name and Michael of Nebadon, and our Father, our Universal Father, and that is Who we are encircuited with.

But the general terms, we're not going to transmit anyone today, unless they happen to come through, but I'll relay some of the transmissions that I've been receiving in terms of that things are different and experientially, it's almost hearkening back to much earlier days learning, I guess the phenomenon of transmitting, it felt like circuits were being built up and learned. And to that respect, that seems to be happening again. So in other words, whereas before you would open up a protocol and a Lightline. These days, it's more like, oh, I seem to be receiving a stream of thought. I better listen more carefully and see if I'm receiving and to that respect that seems to be happening, and some of my duties have changed, assuming some of the roles and leadership of the board that Ron was doing, for example, checking in every morning. And so those are some of the updates I'll be giving.

But in general, one important update for all, on the list, on the forum, is that we're deemphasizing the need to expand the capacity with transmitters for the time being, and that instead of, say, focusing on your training or experiential abilities in transmission, that that's best served in prayer, in worship, and seeking wisdom. And that means seeking the wisdom within which generally seeks the wisdom of the Universal Father within you, and the Father that's the Father that Jesus spoke about, and that would reveal that we all have that capacity of of accessing and having a relationship with.

So a new subject is to reiterate what the Magisterial Foundation is. Certainly from a reporting standpoint, as a foundation 501, c3 is that we spend some of our revenue, which an entity like this is supposed to do, in order not to have a profit, you're supposed to spend X amount percentage on charitable activities. And so those are Lightlines and teams around those Lightlines. It was a kind of staff training for missions and participation, but that's kind of on hold.

But always, is there a general education and topical education with these Lightlines and so this is different from past phenomenon of spiritualism and channeling and whatnot. These are the attempts to reestablish the universe broadcast of the what's been termed as original universe government, or in other words, the government of God that we invoked and talked about at the beginning of this Lightline. So it's universal broadcasts, and it's also revelational education. And in that respect, we have a, we have a membership with and practical application of this in the Lightlines. And we also seek network association into projects and fieldwork.

That was kind of an update I got on 10/30 and yesterday, on 10/31 we got a little more clarification, just a reiteration, on what the Rayson Corporation is set up to do and mainly the personnel within it when we talk about the board right now because there's been a need to clarify the communication process when our membership supports the patent, that's front and center there on the forum. So Ron is the patent owner in the Rayson Corporation. For that reason, he's he is the owner of the patent until he dies because the legal system establishing patents in the United States necessitates or demands that a person, the inventor, is the primary contact, the owner of the patent. Ron, as the patent owner, he's best. He's the best person obviously on why it works.

That's a big distinction between understanding how it works, so someone like myself is very competent in how it works, and I can explain how it works, and I have a basic understanding, because of my time with Ron being educated, of why it works, and he's tried to help you all understand as well why it works, but ultimately, as we evangelize the patent, you are pretty much confident in how it works, and don't get in over your head in ever trying to explain why it works.

That's up to the Rayson Corporation to explain when necessary. Steven also, likewise, has the ability to go out and explain how it works and presenting that to people. He's got some experience in presenting to the public and private sector at this point. Others of you on the forum have helped and to date, you have put yourself in the position of not being able to connect your party, your third party, with us at the Rayson corporation. In that respect, your contacts have turned you, whether you meant to or not, into the negotiators and the go-betweens and that's not a recipe to work. That's not how it's set up to do.

Please just set up a connection between the Rayson Corporation or the patent owner directly. Now, because of Ron's health, I've explained that that situation is in limbo, and for that reason, all developments or activities are now at a standstill. Please cease in actively developing any opportunities, because the status of Ron Besser puts the status of the patent in a limbo that we're frankly, not able to act on it right now. But that doesn't mean you can't make a connection. But if you, if you dare to think you're negotiating anything on our behalf, that's just, that's an error, that's an incorrect way to go about doing it.

George is also on the board. He's specialized in the the range and capacity of the coverage, and his military service puts him in a capacity of being a potential military liaison when it comes to the government. That's just an assumption on my part, George, but you can correct me. Elise has been helping administratively, and most importantly, she's a voting board member. So that would mean in the case of if the board is put into a position of approving something that's being negotiated. She's a voting member on that. Any more board on the human side is to be determined, and an advisory board is certainly likely and encouraged, though we have no one on an advisory board as of yet. We have a couple people in unofficial capacities who are interested parties. So that ends the 10/31 kind of morning session that I'm sharing with you.

And today we'll just continue. I'll share some of the things, but that is to also reaffirm that what we're doing here on the forum is education and services. It's revelation. It's education about revelation. It's also education on spiritual governance, and that also leads into naturally earthly governance. And so what does that ultimately mean? It means we are educating and providing clarification in revelation, because sometimes revelation is an aggregation of previous knowledge and a restatement of what needs to be preserved in knowledge, and sometimes it's a brand new revelation, and that would be explicitly said when that's the case and by who.

And so those things definitely involve the salvation that Lemuel was talking about today, just today, of the soul, and also being born again of the Spirit. So that's spiritual and earthly governance after death and the meaning of what you're ultimately doing in life, and it also deals with the way you are born again of the Spirit, in other words, phasing into a greater reality of spiritual status, even while in the flesh. And so that definitely entails more education and service about the good news and backing that up with good works. And to delve into the modes of operation in revelation is why we started this with the emphasis on prayer, worship, and then using your mind to seek wisdom and that should be within.

The natural tendency in people, and we see this all the time, is that we try to triangulate the truth, and so we take from various sources, and we compare and we contrast, and come up with something that we take as knowledge and belief, and of course, that is filled with of course a journey of a trial and error sometimes. But what I'm getting into is that this new phase is just to reiterate that there is a re-emphasis on the reality that missions may not include the humans, but that it means that we should not fall into the messiah complex of not feeling helpless if there's no divine intervention. Every generation believes it's the well the worst in terms of the global situation of catastrophes and end times, and we lose our ability to affect our world with the good news and the good works, especially with good works, if we sit back and wait for deliverance and without Improving that within ourselves and developing a community effect.

So thank you for listening, in that respect, there is some future news that I don't think we'll say at this time, but we will end with this: that on the forum, Jose, specifically, if you're listening or reading, please stop with the daily Facebook reposting of your timeline. We need to clear the circuits and unless you have a specific reason that you need to explain you're kind of you're gumming it up. So if there's nothing coming in the wire, there needs to be silence and no activity. In other words, if there's no rhyme or reason as to why you're doing it, because you haven't explained why you're doing it, and people are confused, especially when you over time of, say, 10 days. The only thing coming through is that that's outdated information. It hasn't generated any discussion, as it implies it should do, and therefore it's coming across as information that should be read, and that's simply not the case.

I hope you understand why and if you don't understand, always, just talk to me about it. But if you continue, we'll have to take some administrative steps just to educate you on this, if you haven't heard about it, and just ask you to stop. But at the very least, if you're doing it for discussion, explain why, and start a discussion about it, but you can't just leave it out there, because it's taken as information to be read. Now I understand the reason we're doing that is we're you're trying, we're triangulating the truth with it being out there. And that triangulation is not necessarily what's needed at this point, and you're leaving it in the hands of Facebook automation, which seems to dictate; so unless you have a reason why you're putting it out there, you need to state so. And if you don't, please stop, because we need up to date information coming through. I think that's all I have to say about that.

Yeah, yeah, I think that's it. So thank you for listening and Lightlines will probably resume, beginning this Sunday, after the election. So that will put us in it sorry, I'm looking at my calendar. Steve, you there? Can you help me? You're unmuted.

Steven  
Yeah, let's see, that would be the 10th. Is that correct? The Sunday after the election?

Dominick  
Okay, I'll take your word for it.

Steven  
Yes.

Dominick  
There you go, right. So Lightlines are resuming Sunday the 10th. If anyone like Elise, Rene, Lemuel gets a nod to do a Lightline, feel free. But Sunday Lightline will start up with me. Uh, per Ron's wishes, and we're going to do this like we stated after the election, which probably, at this rate, may or may not be decided officially by that time anyway, we'll see. Right, right? Steven, all right. Thanks for listening. Have a good day everyone.

Steven  
Thank you for this, Dominick, really helpful.

Dominick  
Yeah. Thank you. All right, goodbye, everybody.

end
6
God bless you richly, Lemuel, for standing on the wall so faithfully. 

I love to hear your messages and a special thanks for this wonderful song 'Voila' from the angelic Emma Kok. I listened to it many times, it couldn't be more beautiful. Her stomach will get healed in few months; I believe. 

Thank you again, one love,
Valerie 
7
AUDIO TAPE Links - Comments - Schedule inside / Re: Doing THE FATHERS WILL
« Last post by SongatSunrise on December 03, 2024, 12:39:46 pm »
Thank you gcmeyer83!

 
God knows we all can do a whole lot more than we think we can! It is said, "I can do all things through Him who strengthens me!"
And by the way, don't expect perfection the first try. It takes a while to get it right, whatever it is. :D
Thanks for the encouragement :)

 
SaS
8
AUDIO TAPE Links - Comments - Schedule inside / Doing THE FATHERS WILL
« Last post by gcmeyer83 on December 03, 2024, 07:02:01 am »
 
Hello Dear Brothers and Sisters of the Serara Forum.  Last night upon entering bed for a night’s sleep I received the following short contemplation:
 
   You all know that THE FATHER would never ask you to do something you could not do. So what do you do when he does ask you to do something?  You do it of course!  The Father already knows what you are capable of doing and that’s why HE even asks.  That method continues for Eternity.  Start now and you will be with HIM for eternity.
 
GOD’S BLESSES UPON YOU ALL!
 
9
THE SPANISH LANGUAGE LIGHTLINE FOR ALL / Lightline El Salvador 12/1/2024
« Last post by Rene A Duran on December 01, 2024, 21:53:11 pm »
The Universal Father addressed everyone today.
Making way for the study of evolution, Ministry of Deficiency, the Espornagia as the only beings who  reincarnate in Nebadon.

https://www.conferencecalling.com/recordings/1534443/615480/VCISPREC02_615480_20241201_163104

Thank you for listening 

René Durán 
Host
10
General Discussion / JESUS'real life
« Last post by Clency on December 01, 2024, 11:53:05 am »
Maria Valtorta was a mystic from Italy, she is the author of the “THE GOSPEL AS REVEALED TO ME” where she relates the life of JESUS with astounding details approved by experts in different knowledgeable fields, like science, archeology, geography, etc. She was stabbed on the back by an anarchist during a manifestation and she was kept on bed until her death some years later. It is during that time she received the Divine inspiration to write a book in regards to JESUS whom she said will come back in whole His Glory. If you want to know more about Maria Valtorta, just google her name and you will be overwhelmed by her writings as I am.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10