I consider that, without being disrespectful, dreamcat01's reaction to Lemuel's publication "New man in the White House" is not very friendly. As Dreamcat01 itself ends its publication, "If not ............... opinions are just that -----
opinions ", especially when it comes to international politics, which is a very important profession. Before, when we did not have the wonders of the Internet, there was very little that we could find out about what is happening and how the politics of other states affects us, but today not only we can but it is a duty and a necessity to try to find out how it is handle these international relations, and especially those that have to do with the superpowers and, in particular, those that handle the most genoside Empire that has existed throughout the history of Humanity, such as that of the USA and its allies.I am not versed in international politics or historian, but I repeat that today, in the age of satellite communications, it is quite possible to be more aware from the outside than from the inside in many aspects and among them about politics. That no one should intervene in the decision that Americans (or any other country outside their own) want to make to elect their president is very different from having an opinion on the matter. For example, our (Colombian) Nobel Prize in Literature, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, gave his opinion in an interview that was given to him as a result of not being able to attend to receive an honorary degree awarded to him by Culumbia University because he was denied a visa, Gabo (as he was known), declared more or less the following: "I have always felt a special admiration for that great nation and its people, for many reasons: for the high quality and numerous intellectuals, scientists as well as for the very superior form how they administer their public institutions; however, I cannot understand how such a civilized and developed people is so careless in electing their presidents. "
So how can we not give our opinion and on this occasion celebrate by having a president today who represents us great hope, especially for us in countries that remain in the third world when we have suffered too much due to the wrong policy of the USA who considers us their backyard. I celebrated the arrival of Trump instead of a Hillary Clinton because his position-taking speech seemed very encouraging, especially because of his frontal attack on the media. But to the extent that he began to support the opposition in Venezuela and came to classify a former president in Colombia as a hero who has been keeping presidents in power who have only increased drug trafficking, corruption and crime against defenders of human rights to the point that in the current government in two years, there have been more than 70 massacres in which peasants, Indians, students and human rights defenders have been victims, not to mention ex-combatants of the FARC (guerrilla), after having welcomed the signing of the peace treaty. And Mr. Trump maintained his support for this government.
This is enough, but I leave it here because I understand very well that Dreamcat01 was not intended to polemicize, for this reason I ask him to excuse me if I said something that he cannot agree on. Thanks