Show Posts
1
General Discussion / Re: AI
« on: Today at 15:52:48 »
I've been studying AI for my own songwriting and book writing career. Also, to use AI for marketing my label. AI is a technology that helps one think out of the box. Each of us have experiences and methods of thinking we've developed over the years we have been on Urantia. We think along certain lines. What AI can do is open the boundaries and present us with things and paths we didn't think of on our own.
It is not a creative thing. It is a computer brain amalgamating a host of input from sources we probably never considered using. It helps in that way although sometimes, it can come up with "gobbledygook". Nonsensical things because the parameters are done by a machine, not a thinking human brain. But, I think, if used properly, it could help in many ways to present the Missions and our Savior's return to this planet.
However, I would caution that this usage would be subject to extreme criticism by those individuals out there that have no background or understanding of what the technology is and isn't. The danger would be an overall mislabelling of the use of AI and would, IMHO, have to be carefully monitored and the actual workings of the technology made transparent to the public so as to hopefully blunt these objections.
Let's face it, this is not going to be the way humans have always thought these momentous events would happen. The 2nd coming, as it's labeled by churches, has so many different opinions as to what is really going to transpire that the introduction of AI into the picture, could be highly problematic. Shooting the messenger? Possibly. Using misinformation to convince the public that the whole thing is a hoax because of the newness of AI in our world? Possibly. I feel that approach would be tried by those looking to sway public perception to their own point of view. So, in order to negate this, it would require the presenters being vetted and viewed as experts in their fields.
It is not a creative thing. It is a computer brain amalgamating a host of input from sources we probably never considered using. It helps in that way although sometimes, it can come up with "gobbledygook". Nonsensical things because the parameters are done by a machine, not a thinking human brain. But, I think, if used properly, it could help in many ways to present the Missions and our Savior's return to this planet.
However, I would caution that this usage would be subject to extreme criticism by those individuals out there that have no background or understanding of what the technology is and isn't. The danger would be an overall mislabelling of the use of AI and would, IMHO, have to be carefully monitored and the actual workings of the technology made transparent to the public so as to hopefully blunt these objections.
Let's face it, this is not going to be the way humans have always thought these momentous events would happen. The 2nd coming, as it's labeled by churches, has so many different opinions as to what is really going to transpire that the introduction of AI into the picture, could be highly problematic. Shooting the messenger? Possibly. Using misinformation to convince the public that the whole thing is a hoax because of the newness of AI in our world? Possibly. I feel that approach would be tried by those looking to sway public perception to their own point of view. So, in order to negate this, it would require the presenters being vetted and viewed as experts in their fields.