This post is in response to a critical post received else where. The criticism is valid if we were transmitting from earth ways to generate electricity, but we do not generate electricity by wind, sun, or burning fuels. We take directly out of space and the magnetosphere entirely. If you wish to read the post that started all, to to the near bottom where I reprint it. Thank you.
------------------------
RESPONSE:
Geoff you are talking about electricity and its propagation over land and sea. I am not talking about any of that as the tower we use is in the magnetosphere at its very tip, and it does not transmit electricity through the air, but forces its broadcast back into the magnetosphere, and it is the magnetosphere which redistributes the free electricity to roof antennas. I sincerely doubt you will or can understand, we are talking about preparticles not, but about the transmission of a carrier wave that is derived from the muons themselves. I do not understand how or why that happens, but because it happens one can transmit the carrier wave again and again. I make no apology for not understanding how electron energy is disbursed but I know that Muons disperse their carrier wave back into the magnetosphere and not into what Tesla called the aether entirely.
Nor, Geoff, do I declare myself the full understanding why this can take place, but the strange thing is that the muon is the antithesis of an electron, and is a true antigravity particle. No one actually recognizes it, but it happens to be true. Antiparticles are hardly my good knowledge at all, but I am inferring from the power directors, that the muon is finely tuned antimatter as well. I get that from the Urantia Book meaning which states that antimatter is not a preparticle, but it appears as a result of the energy womb of God when Ultimatons are used to dispense the production of electricity with or without the electron or the muon, but electricity is actually the produce of two muons dispensing flux in opposing flux rates inside the muon itself.
I hardly expect you to understand that since no one teaches that electricity is really not a production inside the magnetosphere, but a flux transmission out of the spare electrons peppering the earth surface everywhere including some from the magnetosphere as well. I myself have no such concept but a Power Director Number Five (5) speaks. For those who do not know who or what a Power Director is, they are an example of the universe need for control of vivid energies produced in an expanding universe of power and light and carrier waves of huge importance to we who live on planet earth (Urantia)
"POWER DIRECTORS are not favoring this type of exposition you use Geoff, because you are referencing distribution of electricity as you know it only. What Ron discovered all by himself, is that electricity is not entirely what you on earth think it is. Electricity is more than a flux, but it is also that which remains when a line of electrons work to fulfill the issue of fluxing without producing a new preparticle to remove the difficulty being two valences at the same time. Ron says that electricity is a flux of electrons. That is not EXACTLY true! Electricity is the product of two opposing valences, and for that reason it forms an antigravity particle at the same time.
"ANTIGRAVITY PARTICLES ARE ELASTIC compared to Lepton family characterization. Leptons are fully electronic is principle, but they are not easily distributed as the electron apparently is. Instead the Lepton particles all tend to use one set of extraordinary prematter particles Ron calls Ultimatons. We are aware that a major revelation nearly one hundred years ago on Urantia discovered that the Ultimaton principle Ron uses to maintain valance is a preparticle, is not entirely sound but useful to understand how the preparticle can have an electrical charge, but does not change valence appreciably. To understand valence at all, one has to understand that valence is the result of electrical strength inside a preparticle, and not a valence determination so much as am amperage strength in its actual productive life in the universe to form atoms and associated particles which help to materialize elements.
"AS A POWER DIRECTOR (#5), I have proposed often enough that the revelation about Ultimatons is precious, but in actual fact, the electrical discharge known as electricity is just another flux observed on earth readily. I do not counter the claim the Ultimaton is the culprit which produces changes in the electron when one of them is removed from the electron to produce MUONS, but I declare that it is not muons which produce electricity at all, but that the muon is the carrier wave and not the valence which produces electron electricity.
"Muons can produce electricity by converting back to electrons at the house antenna, but the real culprit at work is not even the magnetosphere, but the decision by they Director of Power on the highest preparticle level, which is a Deity and not deep, cold space itself. That decision is based on the fact that if one sends an Ultimaton to every preparticle needed, there is too few Ultimatons left to do all that it should produces through electron energy flux.
"As a consequence, Geoff, is that you are not incorrect to state that matter does not relate to electricity, but to Ultimatons first, and then to biological reproduction whether it is life or a type of matter that could be life if it were properly identified as a biological mass and not a Permian mass as was illustrated in the original implantation of life on earth sixty-five billion years ago. Ron never argues against this principle, but he does state that Ultimatons are responsible for the change of the electron into a muon. And it is the muon which can carry the amperage of the electron unchanged when it reconverts to an electron at the antenna connection on a house.
"Ron calls this explanation, "rarefied." I conclude he means I am looking at Origins of electricity as almost a divine approach to muon distribution among the electrons as the means to exchange flux power within earth usages. I think he may be right, but it is unprovable. But the flux of an electron is twice the flux of a muon, but because the muon can carry the electron's amperage, the conversion back to an electron for electrical use in the home, is truthfully factual.
"Last, Ron is one of those unusual humans which can picture anything we describe, and he can watch the conversion of an electron to a muon. Please remember that conversion is not one for one. An electron conversion results in five muons arranged around a central muon, with five (5) petal muons arranged around the central muon bonded bot by a mere electronic bond, but bonded by a hammer-like postage stamp over them like placing beans under a shrink wrap containment structure.
That structure is impossible to break unless there is a conversion device. That conversion device in this invention is a fluid antenna style of ferrous material. Finally, to you Ron, you never seem to be free of horrible over power over top of your will to type these answers. Those are not brakes, but force fields sent by the Deity Absolute, from being executed for sharing such high information we produce here. We have full permission to discuss these things, but the structures form anyhow and you bravely continue in spite of such pressures.
"I am Power Director Five (5) and greatly appreciate this Ron, even though your voice is so muted to the outside world of commerce and inability to break through to the commercial world of money and tradition bound sciences forcing a
LASER SOLUTION. There is none and no such solution, but spend billions you do not have to come up with a device that has no real reach to power large sections of the world or country or any homes for long, so long as there is no real viable power to operate lasers properly. A TRUE LASER REQUIRES TEN TIME THE POWER now used and as a result any electricity discharge is marginal. For that reason Livermore Labs must abandon the project and let it sit for other uses which are becoming apparent even now.
"We concluded these remarks with this to you Geoff.
"Ron is not mistaking you worry for the truth. If you are talking only about electrical discharges on earth use, your views are entirely correct, but Ron is not talking about earth usages, but transmission attributes only. He knows that but you do not. Let him figure out preparticles and transmisability, as he has done so beautifully, but never mistake the need to look at what you are arguing about as you speaking to another problem he does not field at all. Consequently, the ads he must place up are as he has done with this Category. He cannot make you listen because you refuse to. However, those who read this will understand your concern. HE does not really address those concerns because he does not have to, as the Magnetosphere does his distribution entirely. We quit now and thank you all. Power Director 5 at your service, K
Ron here:
Power Director 5 (five) is named Susatia, but is shy today and we thank him and the Power Directors in general for translating important elements of electrical production into the human language of English, and now for the mansion worlds, and that is thanks to MICHAEL OF NEBADON permitting this discussion to be read and heard by mansion world citizens.
END
On 2/17/2024 1:20 PM, Geoff Knight wrote:
Ron,
You are confusing the reader with your nonsense about electrons being too heavy to move through the air.
How many times must I repeat this same information to you before you start understanding the primary blunder in your concept of electricity?
IAVE YOU EVEN READ MY EMAILS?
Simply stated in an analogy of the problem:
There is an ocean between two continents. A large earthquake on one continent sets off a tsunami. Within hours, the wave reaches the other side and floods the coastal area of the second continent.
Did the water on the coast of the continent where the tsunami originated, have to physically move across the ocean to reach the other continent?
NO!
The “wave†carried through the “medium†of the water, resonates within the water and transfers the vibrations through it! Each drop of water can remain in place while the resonant waves pass through them.
Please try, Ron, to see how you have misunderstood this concept in the case of electricity. You needn’t be concerned with how to move the particles; the electroMAGNETIC current flows through the particles which can conduct electricity, while the particles themselves are NOT moving!
You continue to make false statements because of your false assumptions.
I would appreciate the courtesy of your attention to this matter, Ron. Believe me, I am only trying to help you with your understanding and to get you over this simple, yet monumental problem that keeps you from being able to see clearly that you’re not going to get anywhere with the misunderstanding you hold dear.
A FEW ISSUES OF CONCERN:
1: The magnetosphere is 40,000 miles away from the surface of the Earth
2: If you broadcast a signal to the magnetosphere to reflect back to earth, it is Amplitude Modulation (AM), not Frequency Modulation (FM).
3: FM stations are broadcast on the odd number, while the “adjacent frequencies†are the even ones, equally separating the radio stations from the ones next to them. (You changed from 86.1 to 86.4 MHz, which is an adjacent frequency, not a broadcast frequency).
4: Nikola Tesla’s Wardencliff tower worked very well, sending a scalar wave through the atmosphere to reach the Stony Tunguska River in Siberia, circa 1908. You need to brush up on your history. Try reading “The Fantastic Inventions of Nikola Tesla.â€
5: Quarks are really short-lived when separated from their respective elements in a hadron collider. The idea that they orbit protons is far fetched; six variations of quarks are known to exist, and they transform into W or Z bosons in a fraction of time.
Selah.
Geoffrey Knight