Lesson 32 SALVINGTON. Types of Regulation in Governance. 09.06.22

[Dominick O]

Lesson 32 SALVINGTON
Types of Regulation in Governance
Tue, 9/6/2022, York, PA, United States
Transmitter Teacher(s): SALVINGTON and UVERSA
Receiver(s): Dominick O
Audio Link (22m)
 
 
Tuesday, York, PA September 6^th.
 
SALVINGTON:
Today's topic is a key word, regulation. Regulation has, for the sake of this concept introduction, a couple of phases. One being an outside regulation, and two, being inside regulation. Outside regulation correlating to things outside of yourself as an individual, regulating your behavior, thoughts, and so on; regulating the rules of the environment, and the playing field, and so on. And then there is inner regulation, regulating the automatic things, say, in your brainstem. That is one form of regulation. But then there is the regulation pertaining to this lesson, and governance of regulating your appetites, your proclivities, your behavior, decisions; about the benefits or drawbacks in relation to your wants and needs, and the greater units of things outside of yourself, family, society, civilization and so. Or are the organizations you get involved with. And certainly, we can look at the animal kingdom and see how there is a regulation amongst the pack or the tribe, and more of an autoregulation amongst the mind circuitry of, say, insects. Or even the regulation amongst an ecosystem that somehow tends to balance things out, or in fact regulate, upon each other. And certainly, there are cases, often, where we see this regulation become out of balance. Where something overrides something else, invasive species and so on. Or simply resources running out and migration patterns affected. So, with that in mind, we turn to the regulations and regulation of the human, or for that matter, regulation amongst the Order of
Sons.
 
So, in summary, we have autoregulation of your unconscious mind, willful regulation of your conscious mind, and regulation imposed from the outside, based off of your human structures of organization. And then finally the spectrum of that which we will term governance with its factors of relationships and its relationship to the environment. In fact, let's modify that. The environment certainly plays a role in all of these mentioned. But we will have unconscious regulation, conscious, willful regulation, and governance regulation. Governance pertaining to various sizes of structures, ranging from a familial relationship, even a spousal one, all the way to governance. There.
 
Some questions abound, as to what Peace looks like. How will Peace be known, other than the absence of war? Which constantly has its phases of planning, and contingency and threat of war, its economy of war. And with that comes various threats of enforced governance of essentially warfare of regulation upon its own populace. Which may or may not be citizens based off of how participatory they are allowed to be in their own governance. And of course, that's where you have conflicts. When these various forms of governance, not inherently or eventually, but evolutionarily, become in contrast and contact, and friction with each other. Certainly, if your government is putting you in quarantine, to the point of starvation, you are in conflict of that regulation for your own survival. Whereas, a skin to skin transmission, of say monkeypox, is a collectively self-regulation failure of behavior.
 
So, back to the rhetorical questions of evolution of governance and regulation. What will Peace look like? A different a new peace with the absence of war. The prediction, simulations, and patterns of evolution from past experiences on different planets, indicates competition-warfare will turn inward and begin to regulate bad actors, bad behavior, non-compliance. In other words, with the focus of warfare being changed to or from conquest and existential threat of its neighbors and their ideologies, and philosophies, and religions; and into an inward prosecution of those behaviors and decisions that threaten the civilization at various levels. In other words, if there is regulation to save an ecosystem, then, the behaviors of groups of people, whether they be tribal, or whether they be a tribal Corporation, we will call a Syndicate. These bad-acting behaviors will be regulated, evolutionarily, if and when peace is upon the civilization. To the point where the focus of existential threats becomes the focus of real threats.
 
Now, let us go on to a different subject within the same lesson. And that is the balance between the individual unit, who is allowed enough freedom that they have a risk of harm to themselves or others through a lack of self-regulation. And this has proven to be not as disastrous as over-regulating the thoughts and behavior to the point where there is no freedom for the individual or group. Why? Because a group and individual society able, enabled with Freedom has a flexibility in a chaotic environment to respond to adapt. Evolution is the name of the game is it not? And those societies and civilizations without it, have in the past, last conflicts, lost response-times to inward disasters. And the people have suffered more when evolution has been called for.
 
That's a key word to call into focus. In other one words, it is an evolutionary adaptive ability, not an ideology. And what also entails is a learning ability. Adapting and evolution suggests there is learning involved. And when a civilization governance is, really, just after absolute power, there is only a greater and greater draconian over-control, to the point where it invites disaster upon itself. We observe and we submit, rebellion governance takes both of these extremes and invites disaster upon itself. It is overly free. And with its universe insanity becomes overly draconian, with its freedom to rebel and invites disaster of its own insanity and becomes iniquitous. Hence, it is a shining example of irregulation, mal-regulation, on all levels.
 
Let's examine one philosophy of governance regulation, and that is their insanity beyond the evolution of the logic, which is, security through mutual destruction. Political blackmail through self-destruction. These are the insanities, if not irrationalities, of time-space mind. And nothing sums up this irrationality then the self-evident fact, that you took your life for granted until that flashpoint when it is gone. And so, how do we resolve these universe phenomenon dilemmas? For you the Ascender, you are granted eternal life, in so much as you are finally at the stage of self-regulation. And that is enabled by your will becoming, evolving, in line and in synchrony with the Universal Father.
 
We submit war-ism is a form of slavery, it is an evolutionary form of slavery. And therefore, Peace, we will define as the absence of war-ism, is a new, evolutionarily attained status unseen on this planet before. A new era of peace is not just the absence, temporarily, of war, it is the sustained, stabilized state that war is no longer possible. And we submit that this new evolutionary state of planetary civilization, will breed the attention span of humans to redirect that energy, into enforcement of governance it may have established in the first place, that was simply never been enforced. And there will eventually be this balancing out, between freedom, and lack of freedom with enforced conformity. And individuals and groups of individuals will have an environment where they can evolve and learn. And certainly, with an education, to boot, about the universe, about who they are in the spiritual material, mindal world of reality. That they will eventually evolve into a state where they can learn self-governance, through their endowments of spirit. and that is what it takes to have sustained governance. That is what we will define as Light and Life.
 
So, We thank you for listening. You are free to wander in your thoughts regarding this lesson. Because there is no one-answer, rather a dynamic flux of evolution. Good day, We're out.
 
Dominick O:
Well, thank you for this transmission, it was well received, and we honor your presence. Was there any author attribution?
 
Salvington:
This was a collective conglomeration. We represent Nebadon, Dominion, and we received help from Uversa. We will leave it at that. Thank you.